【任一包養行情鋒】文明沖突，還是文明化合?——從錢穆禮教論省檢亨廷頓命題的窘境與前途

requestId:6852da2bc89fa6.40919786.

Civilization conflict, or is it a combination of civilization? – The dilemma and future of Huntington’s fate from the Money Murong Educational Discourse Province

Author: Ren Yan

Source: Author Author Authorized Confucian Network, Originally published by “World Religion” No. 1, 2023

Abstract: Regarding Huntington’s civilization conflict and national consensus, can it be proposed that systematic and critical thinking based on Chinese civilization will increasingly show the importance in the new era. Compared with religious studies, MoMu compared the Chinese and foreign civilizations, he particularly focused on the teachings that developed and the teachings of the heart, and placed them in the perspective of state politics and religion in the form of civilization, which showed a substitute thinking of Huntington’s fate. Through the teachings, money has established a new coordinate system for distinguishing the religious trees of Chinese and Western countries, so whether it is integrated with the humanistic path of humanities. Regarding the concept of civilization and the two-dimensional arguments, rituals are the former classics, which can not only embrace external religions, but also form a unity of politics, religion and politics. Chinese civilization took unity and harmony as the state-establishing state, advocated the establishment of politics and religion, recommended the rule of law, and diverged in the East. Multi-state struggles were used as the state-establishing state, and advocated the separation of politics and religion and advocated the rule of law. Without seeing this civilization different, modern Eastern countries establish civilization hegemony, non-Eastern world seeks to “overification”, and then conflict with the Eastern. This is a triple tragic far-reaching scene of Oriental universalism’s performance, and Huntington’s fate has not yet overcome this dilemma. The civilized tradition of the vast Chinese people and the extended thousands of times shows us the wisdom of super-large group aggregation, and is a historical book that gives us the advantages of teaching and controversy. Money-Mu emphasized that modern China should inherit and open its own civilization path in the establishment of religion, politics, economy and political systems, take responsibility for leading the East Asia region, introduce the civilized mechanism of integration, and gradually provide public goods to the human community to promote the development of the modern war. For human civilization, the sacred Jesus, the sacred Jesus, and the sacred Heritage of the sacred Heritage are the real way of coordination and integration that civilization is reborn and relied.

The civilization controversy and national agreement proposed by Huntington in his early academic life have had a profound impact on the changes in the world order in the past thirty years. The Huntington mission is based on the benefits of the american country. On the one hand, he took the initiative to withdraw from the universalist ideological and form warfare, and identified enemies with a civilized thinking and vision, instigating potential conflicts between the Eastern European and American civilizations and Islamic civilizations and Confucian civilizations. On the other hand, he emphasized the steadfast stimulation of the american country. href=”https://twilovedating999.com/”>Baoqing StoriesRu—The Protestantism of the Sarkian people worships tradition, curbs the pluralistics of civilizations and prevents the internal transformation of civilizations from conflicting with each other. In the internal affairs of the american administration after his death, people conclude that the depressed hero was found.Tington Spirit[1]. Whether the Huntington mission can become an automatic prediction is an unsettling scenario, and this disturbing energy-absence seems to be getting stronger and stronger.

As China slowly recovers, we need to think carefully about the Eastern challenge represented by the Huntington mission in the construction of the order of living. In this issue, we show a civilizational argument that focuses on the religious worship system. Our response cannot be limited to international politics and comparative political levels. We should develop a thinking based on the system and criticality of the Chinese civilization, and be able to deeply explore the foundation of the civilization worship system, including and understand the internal and external formats of the country [2]. In this regard, the deep thinking of Master Mo Mu’s surrounding the tribute civilization is realistic and extremely relevant. In addition to the well-known abstractions of historians, Mo Mu finally thought about the different civilizations of China and abroad, and encouraged himself by being knowledgeable. Religious learning is very tight in his academic thinking system and has not yet been developed. Based on the experience and insights of the two world wars and the cold war, his teachings and teaching theory is condensed into one with the theory of civilization type – the political and educational order, which instigates us to a replacement thinking of Huntington’s fate, which deserves special attention and exploration.

1. “Stand up the heart for the six-harmony” and “Traveling the National Purpose of the Religion of China”: The last article of the academic life of Mr. Mu, “The Profits of Chinese Civilization for the Future of Humanity” was published in 1990. It regards the unity of man and nature as the highest theme of Chinese civilization, and the integration of energy included in this is extremely precious for the future of humanity to beg for peace [3]. This is the end of the religion that Mohmuliu gave to the public. In the tide of the era when the Cold War is about to end and Huntington proposed a contradiction of civilization three years later, this religion particularly shows the difference between the energy and minds of China and the West. The important view of civilizational theory on Huntington’s subjects focuses on the political, economic and ideological forms of the civilization circle and its focus countries in modern international vision, and characterizes China as a Chinese civilization (or Confucian civilization), lacking the profound wisdom of this civilization type from the civilization represented by religion and the traditional dimension. And this is exactly the best at MoMu’s study.

Xi Mu is not a strict religious scholar, just like a historian, political scientist or thinker in the modern academic division [4]. However, in the end, the comparison between Chinese and foreign civilizations is relatively relevant. The theory of religion is quite rich, but it is not systematically presented with the strict and scheming style of academic disciplines. Some scholars believe that comparing Chinese and Western civilizations with religion as the key point represents a shift in the focus of Chinese and Western civilizations after their middle age [5]. He has discussed religious issues in many special works, including “A Discussion on the History of Chinese Civilization”, “A Great Issues of Civilization”, “Mind of Chinese Historical Studies”, “Ten Discussions of Life”, etc., which are more concentrated accounts in “Soul and Heart”, and are about religion and modern civilization systems.The narrative is fully displayed in the “Modern Chinese Academic Discussion” and “Blind Speech in Evening Schools” in his late years.

We first grasped his religious views from his old age. “Modern Chinese Academic Discussion” was written in mid-1980. It is a systematic reflection of modern Chinese academics based on lifelong governance. Its main theme can be considered as “the whole is connected and the use is used separately” [6]. Based on the continuous promotion of Chinese civilization and academic tradition, the book adapts and transforms the Oriental Academic Sub-specialty system introduced by modern China, so that it can integrate its energy into China and achieve the fairness of “righteous virtue, application, and prosperity”. Through the separate discussions on the twelve sub-subjects, including religion, science, philosophy, history, teaching, politics, literature and music, this book develops a systematic vision of comparing Chinese and foreign civilizations.

The most noteworthy thing is that Yu Mu’s modern academic review puts “A Brief Discussion on Chinese Religion” in the first chapter of the beginning, and is divided into two sections. Money’s arguments are also rich in fruitful ambiguity: on the one hand, for religious arguments that mark Eastern civilization, they believe that Chinese religion is important for imported goods, and in their own civilization当当当-story-share”>当当当-story-share”>当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当当�